CLASSIFICATION
OF CARBONATES
Rocks are classified in order to communicate information about
them. All classifications of limestones are arbitrary and they
frequently overlap or do not fit ones particular needs. Since
binocular microscopes or hand lenses are the tools that are
commonly available to the explorationist, a practical classification
should be based on descriptions using them. When these instruments
are used, it is usually possible to identify the individual
grains forming the rock. Thus most classifications require that
the most significant sedimentary particle in the rock be described.
For instance, if a rock is composed of ooids, it is termed and
oolitic limestone. If the limestone also contains a minor element
such as skeletal fragments, then it is called a skeletaloolitic
limestone.
Two of the most widely
used classifications are those of Folk (1959,1962) and Dunham
(1962). Both classifications subdivide limestones primarily on
the basis of matrix content.


Most limestones are
classified by Folk allochemical rocks if they contain over l0%
allochems (transported carbonate grains). Based on the percentage
of interstitial material, the rocks may be further subdivided
into two groups: sparry allochemical limestones (containing a
sparry calcite cement of clear coarsely crystalline mosaic calcite
crystals) and microcrystalline allochemical limestone(containing
microcrystalline calcite mud, micrite, which is subtranslucent
grayish or brownish particles less than about 5 microns in size).
Further subdivision is based on the allochem ratios of Folk (1962)
are shown in Scholle & Ulmer-Scholle (2003).
Thus Folk's classification
(figures above) is most suited for
thin section study. Remember that he terms rocks with appreciable
matrix as micrites while matrix-free rocks that contain sparry
calcite cement are termed sparites. As you can see sparites and
micrites are further subdivided by means of their most common
grains.


In contrast, Dunham's
classification (figures above) and
its modification by Embry and Klovan (1971) and James (1984) deals
with depositional texture. For this reason, his scheme may be
better suited for rock descriptions that employ a hand lens or
binocular microscope. For example, if the grains of a limestone
are touching one another and the sediment contains no mud, then
the sediment is called a grainstone. If the carbonate is grain
supported but contains a small percentage of mud, then it is known
as a packstone. If the sediment is mud supported but contains
more than 10 percent grains, then it is known as a wackestone,
and if it contains less than 10 percent grains and is mud supported,
it is known as a mudstone.
If one compares the
two classifications, a rock rich in carbonate mud is termed a
micrite by Folk and a mudstone or wackestone by Dunham. Moreover,
a rock containing little matrix is termed a sparite by Folk and
a grainstone or packstone by Dunham. The wide range of percentage
of mud matrix that a carbonate may have and still be termed a
packstone by Dunham sometimes reduces the utility of this classification.
Embry has modified Dunham's classification and Klovan (1971)
to include coarse grained carbonates (above
figure). In their revised scheme, a wackestone in which
the grains are greater than 2mm in size is termed a floatstone
and a coarse grainstone is called a rudstone.
Both terms are extremely
useful in description of limestones. Embry and Klovan to more
graphically reflect the role that the organisms performed during
deposition also modified the boundstone classification of Dunham.
Terms such as bafflestone, bindstone, and framestone are useful
in concept but are extremely difficult to apply to ancient limestones
where diagenesis and sample size limit ones ability to assess
an organisms function.
References
Dunham, R. J., 1962, Classification of carbonate rocks according to depositional texture. In: Ham, W. E. (ed.), Classification of carbonate rocks: American Association of Petroleum Geologists Memoir, p. 108-121.
Embry, AF, and Klovan, JE, 1971, A Late Devonian reef tract on Northeastern Banks Island, NWT: Canadian Petroleum Geology Bulletin, v. 19, p. 730-781.
Folk, R.L., 1959, Practical petrographic classification of limestones: American Association of Petroleum Geologists Bulletin, v. 43, p. 1-38.
Folk, R.L., 1962, Spectral subdivision of limestone types, in Ham, W.E., ed., Classification of Carbonate Rocks-A Symposium: American Association of Petroleum Geologists Memoir 1, p. 62-84.
James, N.P., 1984, Shallowing-upward sequences in carbonates, in Walker, R.G., ed., Facies
Models: Geological Association of Canada, Geoscience Canada, Reprint Series 1, p. 213–228.
Scholle, P. A. and Ulmer-Scholle, D. S, 2003, A Color Guide to the Petrography of Carbonate Rocks: AAPG Memoir 77, 474 p