Basic Interpretation

Seismic Sequence Analysis
Exercise Two

The exercise objective is to make a sequence stratigraphic interpretation of a seismic line through the lower Cretaceous of the offshore of South Africa. The commonest identifiable geometries are the onlapping strata of transgressions and high stands (commonly lumped together since they often cannot be separated), and those downlapping during lowstand regressions.

This is the second of a series of exercises in seismic sequence analysis provided by the SEPM sequence stratigraphy web site. The seismic line used in this exercise is a copy of Figure 39 from page 49 of the AAPG Atlas of the "sequence stratigraphy in offshore South African Divergent basins". The figure was chosen because it contains clear and easy to interpret examples of onlapping and downlapping sequence geometries and a relatively uncomplicated structural fabric.
The figure is from the AAPG Atlas and is one of many other similar examples that were initially interpreted by Soekor (Pty) Ltd during their exploration for potential Cretaceous lowstand hydrocarbon traps offshore South Africa..

To gain access to the graphics image with the un-interpreted seismic section exercise, click on the image above to download it (click here for a smaller version of same section). Print the file of the seismic or transfer it directly to a PC, Notebook, Tablet, or Pad and using drawing tools that include Power Point follow the procedures outlined in the introduction to interpret this. First identify the termination of seismic reflectors at discontinuity surfaces; then establish which of these surfaces form the sequence boundary.

You should follow the procedures outlined in the introduction above to interpret this line. First identify the termination of seismic reflectors at discontinuity surfaces
; then establish which of these surfaces form the sequence boundary. Follow this by demarking the geometries of the sequences and the systems tracts they include.

Working with a print of the downloaded seismic line:
1) Identify and number the sequence boundaries from the base up, also identify the major faults.
2) Now indicate the positions of the systems tracts including "lowstand systems tracts", "transgressive systems tracts" and "highstand systems tracts". In this seismic data set you will find that the separation of "transgressive systems tracts" and "highstand systems tracts" maybe an arbitrary decision so in this case we advise taking the approach to seismic interpretation followed by Embry and Johannessen (1992) in which they argue the sections they interpreted could best be separated into T–R sequence stratigraphic units.
3) Finally construct a chronostratigraphic chart for this seismic section using the methodology described in the section on chronostratigraphy.

Click on left image to view a the solution and match it with your interpretation(click here for a smaller version of same section).


L.F. Brown, Jr., J. M. Benson, G. J. Brink, S. Doherty, A. Jollands, E. H. A. Jungslager, J. H. G. Keenan, A. Muntingh, and N. J. S. van Wyk, 1996, sequence stratigraphy in Offshore South African Divergent basins: An Atlas on Exploration for Cretaceous Lowstand Traps by Soekor (Pty) Ltd, AAPG Studies in Geology #41, ISBN#0-89181-049-8, 184 page

Embry, A.F., Johannessen, E.P., 1992, T–R sequence stratigraphy, facies analysis and reservoir distribution in the uppermost Triassic- Lower Jurassic succession, western Sverdrup basin, Arctic Canada. In: Vorren, T.O., Bergsager, E., Dahl-Stamnes, O.A., Holter, E., Johansen, B., Lie, E., Lund, T.B. (Eds.), Arctic Geology and Petroleum Potential, vol. 2 (Special Publication). Norwegian Petroleum Society (NPF), pp. 121–146.

Monday, October 21, 2013
Tulsa Web Design    Tulsa Graphic Design     Tulsa SEO    Tulsa Search Engine Optimization