Home
Links, Reviews & Literature
History of Stratigraphy
Terminology Debate
Carbonate and Petrology Links
General Geology & Other Links
Sequence Stratigraphy Links
Paleontological Links
Book Reviews
Literature and Bibliographies
Appalachian Papers
Arabian & Permian Basin Refs
Bahamas Geology References
Basin Analysis Papers
Carbonates & Sea Level Papers
Deepwater References
Eolian Sequence Stratigraphy
Guarico Basin References
Holocene Carbonate Refs
Ichnology/Gen Seq Strat Papers
Libyan Geology Bibliography
Mallorca Geology Bibliography
Permian Basin Bibliography
Sediments - Computer Models
Sequence Stratigraphy - Papers
Sequence Stratigraphy - Texts
Simulating Basin Fill Papers
UAE References
Virginia Geology References
Well Log Bibliography
Lectures
Seq. Stratigraphy Lect.
Seq. Stratigraphy Stream Lect.
Seq. Stratigraphy Term. Debate
ChemoStrat Introduction
Chemostratigraphy
Oxygen Isotopes
Carbon Isotopes
Radioisotopes
Sulfur Isotopes
Strontium Isotopes
Exercises
Well log exercises
Seismic sequence stratigraphy
Hydrocarbon exploration
Exercise Print Outs
Gallery
Image Gallery
Complete Listing
Appalachian Mts - Early Paleozoic
Silurian and Ohio Shale I64 Ky
Silurian AA Hwy Ky
Ordovician Winchester Ky
Ordovician Maysville Ky
Ordovician Build Up Rock Dell
Nolichucky Fm St. Paul Va
Nolichucky Fm Hansonville Va
Nolichucky Fm Lebanon Va
Pre-Cambrian Tenn Rt 23
Bahama Banks
Bank Surface, Maps, and Margin
Joulter Cays
Bahamian Reefs
Staniard Creek - Andros
West Andros Tidal Flats
Lee Stocking & Exumas
Normans Pond Cay
Barre Terre - Great Exumas
Pleistocene - Bahama Bank
Belize Reefs and Lagoons
Burren Karst Region Gallery
Black Head
Ballyallaban Burren
Sheshymore Limestone Gallery
Canning Basin
Carbonate Particle Thin Sections
Settings and Lime Mud
Skeletal - Corals thru Echinoids
Bryozoan thru Coccoliths
Grain Carbonates
Carbonate Porosity
Clare Basin Gallery
Leck Point to Bromore West
Rinevilla Point
Kilcredaun Light House
Rehy Cliffs Ross Fm
Kilclogher Cliffs Ross Fm
Kilbaha Bay Ross Fm
Dunmore Bay Ross Fm
Loop Head Ross Fm
Ross Bay Ross Fm
Bridges of Ross Ross Fm
Fisherman's Pt Ross Fm
Gull Island Formation
Tullig Point Tullig Fm
Trusklieve Tullig Fm
Foohagh Pt Doonlicky Fm
Diamond Rocks Tullig Fm
Spanish Pt Doonlicky Fm
Deepwater Sed Structures
Deepwater Fans
Fining Upward Beds
Flute and Load Casts
Mud Volcanoes
Eniwetok Holocene Reefs
Florida Carbonates
Florida Reefs and Bays
Pleistocene - Florida
Great Barrier Reef
Heron Island Reef
Low Isles Reefs
Regional Reefs and Maps
Gulf of Carpentaria
Norman River and Karumba
Central South Carpentaria
Hook Head Ireland
Geological Diagrams & Maps
Lwr Carb Slope Carbonates
Lwr Carb Dolomitized Carbonate
Templetown Bay
Devonian Harry Lock Fm
Woarway Bay Porter's Gate Fm
Lumsdin's Bay Porter's Gate Fm
Booley Bay Fm
Ordovician Caradocian
Mallorca Gallery
Maps, diagrams and Images
Late Miocene Llucmajor Reef
Moroccan Geology
Satellite Images
Okefenokee Swamps
Eastern Okefenokee Swamp
Western Okefenokee Swamp
Peach Tree Rock Eocene
Permian Basin
Regional Geology
Permian Basin and Slope
Permian Basin Margin Crest
Permian Basin Tepee & Platform
Permian Basin Evaporites
Permian Basin Fields
Shark Bay & Lake MacLeod
Shark Bay Stromatolites
Lake MacLeod
Saudi Arabian Outcrops
Tepee Structures
Holocene Tepees
Ancient Tepees
Turks and Caicos Image Gallery
Turks and Caicos Basic Geology
N Caicos - Onshore & Offshore
Tidal Flats Overflight
Tidal Flats Day Trip
Tidal Flats By Years
N Caicos - Middle Shoals
Ambergris Island & Shoal
Ambergris Shoal
Ambergris Isle
Providenciales Reefs
Providenciales Fore Reef
Providenciales Patch Reef
Providenciales SW Point
Little Water Cay
West Caicos Pleistocene
Pleistocene Part 1
Pleistocene Part 2
Pleistocene Part 3
Pleistocene Part 4
UAE Settings Gallery
Holocene Barrier and Lagoon
Evaporites and Aeolian
Butler's Cores Abu Dhabi
Qanatir Field Trip
Musafah Field Trip
Kenig Field Trip
Movies Gallery
Sedpak Movies
Sequence Stratigraphy Movies
YouTube Geology Movies
Animated Gif
Index of Site Contents
STRATA Encyclopedia
Sequence Stratigraphy
Intro Sequence Stratigraphy
Basics of Sequence Stratigraphy
Sequence Stratigraphic Framework
Basin Clastic Sequence Hierarchies
Mixed Clastics and Carbonates
Carbonate Sequences
Carbonate Seq Strat
Type 1 Sequence Boundary (SB1)
Type 2 Sequence Boundary (SB2)
Relative Sea Level
Eustatic Sea Level
Stratigraphic Cycle Hierarchy
Sloss's Second Order
Bounding Surfaces
Transgressive Systems Tract
Carbonate Ramp Lithofacies
Carbonate Ramp Facies Belts
Carbonate Stacking Patterns
Composite Sequences
HF Sequence Systems Tracts
Open ramp profile
Sigmoid Clinoform Ramp
Exposed shelf, basin-fill model
Clastic-Carbonate Ramp
Reef-rimmed shelf profile
Dunham Carbonate Classification
Deepwater Sequences
Deepwater Processes & Sediment
Deepwater Element & Architect.
Deepwater Source and Settings
Deepwater Seq. Stratigraphy
Deepwater Sediments Co Clare
Deepwater and Clare Basin Gallery
Deepwater Exercises
Deepwater References
Deepwater Early Studies
History of Stratigraphy
Significant Dates
Development of Stratigraphy
Origin of Geologic Periods
Plate Tectonics
Peter Vail and Eustasy
History Links
Exercises and Lectures
Phanerozoic Onlap Charts
Outcrop Interpretation
Carbonates Outcrop
Mallorca Movies
Mallorca Exercises 1
Mallorca Exercises 2
Mallorca Exercises 3
Mallorca Image Gallery
Mallorca Literature
Clastics Outcrop
Book Cliffs Exercises
Book Cliffs References
Well Log Interpretations
Intro Well Log Seq Strat
Well Log Suites
Character of Log Response
High Frequency Clastic Seq Str
Guarico Basin Log Responses
Exercise 1
Exercise 2
Exercise 3
Exercise 4
Exercise 5
Solutions to Exercises
Guarico Basin - References
High Frequency Carb.
Hanifa Fm Exercises
Permian Basin Exercise
Skydavian Exercise
Arabian & Permian Basin Refs
Seismic Interpretation
Basic Interpretation
Tie Synthetic to Seismic
San Joaquin
Santa Margarita
Vedder/Jewett Sands
Bahamas
Bahamas - Objectives & Data
Bahamas - Exercise Outline
Bahamas Geology References
NPRA
Objectives & Data
Final Report
Sequence Stratigraphy Links
Sequence Stratigraphy - Papers
Sequence Stratigraphy - Texts
Depositional Analogues
Appalachian Trip
Appalachian Mts - Pound Gap
Appalachian Trip
Appalachian Mts - Late Paleozoic
Penn Breathitt Fm Fluvial Ky 23
Breathitt Fm Penn Louisa Ky23
Penn Deltaic Pikeville East Ky 23
Breathitt Fm Tidal Pen Ky I64
Back Barrier Pen Ky I64
Pottsville Pen Barrier I75 Tn
Miss Ooids Carter Caves Ky I64
Miss Tidal Channels Ky I64
Newman Lst Miss Ky 801
Newman Lst Tidal Miss Ky 519
Borden Mississippian Ky 801
Borden Mississippian Ky I64
Berea Devonian AAHwy Kty
Appalachian Maps & Diagrams
Devonian thru Lwr Miss
Newman Lst Mississippian
Up Newman Lst Mississippian
Stony Gap Fm Mississippian
Pennington & Lee Formations
Hook Head Ireland
County Clare Ireland
Okefenokee Swamp
UAE Field Trips
UAE Settings
UAE Holocene
UAE Reefs
UAE Ooids
UAE Grapestones
UAE Travertines
UAE Mangroves
UAE Sabhka
UAE Butler's Sabkha Cores
UAE Dunes
UAE Jurassic
UAE Holocene Conclusions
UAE Holocene Photos (gallery)
UAE References
UAE Ancient PDFs
Arabian and Permian Basins
Dedication
Acknowledgements2
Abstract
Introduction
Arabian Basin Geology
Arabian Basin Tectonics
Arabian Intrashelf Basins
Arabian Basin - Hanifa
Arabian Basin Petroleum
Permian Basin Geology
Permian Basin Tectonics
Permian Basin Petroleum
Conclusions and Comparisons
Nassir Saeed Alnaji
Co Clare Ireland
Burren Karst Region Gallery
Central Clare Group
Gull Formation
Ross Formation
Clare Shales
Clare Basin Gallery
Libyan Oil Basins
Regional Geology
Hydrocarbon Basins
Cyrenaica Platform
Ghadamis Basin
Khufra Basin
Murzurq Basin
Sirt Basin
Tripolitanian Basin
Exploration History & Future
Bibliography
Paleontology
Paleontology Research
Foraminifera Introduction
History and Geologic Range
Classification scheme
Test Morphology
Phylogeny and Biology
Applications
Foraminifera types (life strategy)
Benthic Foraminifera
The Paleozoic forams
The Triassic forams
The Jurassic forams
The Cretaceous forams
The Paleogene forams
The Neogene forams
Planktonic Foraminifera
Paleoecology and Paleogeography
The Paleozoic
The Triassic
The Jurassic
The Cretaceous
The Paleogene
The Neogene
Sediments & Rocks
Carbonates
Carbonate Classification
Carbonate Petrology
Carbonate Facies
Diagenesis and Porosity
Arabian Intrashelf Basins
Carbonate and Source Rocks
Tectonic Controls on Evaporite
Carbonate Plays
Carbonate Glossary
Holocene Carbonates Papers
Holocene Carbonate Refs
Carbonates & Sea Level Papers
Carbonate and Petrology Links
Acknowledgements
Carbonate Thin Sections
Chemical Grains
Thin Section Gallery
Exercises
Chertification
Thin Section Gallery
Exercises
Intraclast
Thin Section Gallery
Exercises
Micrite
Thin Section Gallery
Exercises
Neomorphosed
Thin Section Gallery
Exercises
Ooids
Thin Section Gallery
Exercises
Pellets and Pelloids
Thin Section Gallery
Exercises
Pisolites and Oncoids
Thin Section Gallery
Exercises
Skeletal Grains
Thin Section Gallery
Exercises
Galleries
Literature
Clastics
Clastic Thin Sections
Depositional Settings
Barrier Islands
Barrier Island Introduction
Island Migration
Tidal Influence
Wave Action
Sediment Supply
Beach Profile
Depo Settings of Barrier Islands
Tectonics and Barrier Islands
Fisheries
Island Conservation
Endangered Species
Beach Remediation
Questions about Beaches
Deltaic
Wave Dominated Deltas
Tide Dominated Deltas
Fluvial Dominated Deltas
Homopycnal Flow
Hyperpycnal Flow
Hypopycnal Flow
Inertia-dominated
Friction-dominated
Buoyancy-dominated
Questions about Deltas
References
Carbonate Shelf
Carbonate Factory
Evolution
Lag Time
Antecedent Topography
Biology
Climatic Zone
Siliclastic Influx
Temperature and Salinity
Clastic Input
Tectonism
Platform Morphology
Unrimmed
Rimmed
Banks and Epieric Shelves
Stratigraphic Succession
Water Depth and Turbidity
Subsidence
Lithofacies
Water Circulation
Carbonate Growth Potential
Response to Eustasy
Questions about Shelves
Carbonate Shelf References
Clastic Shelf
Dominant Processes
Classification
Questions on clastic shelves
Carbonate Slope
Climate and Slopes
Sea Level and Slope
Slopes and TST
Slopes and HST
Slopes and FSST
Slopes and LST
Oceanographic Setting
Sediment Supply and Structures
Sediment Transport and Erosion
Slope Morphology
Slope Biology
Tectonics and Slope
Modern Slopes
Ancient Slopes
Clastic Slopes
Exercises
Links, Reviews & Literature
About
Authors
How to contribute
Sponsors
Helpful links
What is New
World Petroleum
Current Data
Petroleum Links
Reserves and Consumption
Reports and Presentations
Anacostia River Basin Study
Libya
Pannonian Basin Hungary
W Texas and Saudi Arabia
Csato Petroleum Presentations
Anacostia River Basin Study
SEPM HOME
|
SEPM PUBLICATIONS
|
CONTACT
Site
Section
Home
STRATA Encyclopedia
Sequence Stratigraphy
Depositional Analogues
Paleontology
Sediments & Rocks
About
Helpful links
What is New
World Petroleum
Current Data
Petroleum Links
Reserves and Consumption
Reports and Presentations
Anacostia River Basin Study
Libya
Pannonian Basin Hungary
W Texas and Saudi Arabia
Csato Petroleum Presentations
World Petroleum
>
Reports and Presentations
>
Anacostia River Basin Study
Stratigraphic Characterization & Ground Water Flow in Poplar Point Area, Anacostia River
Basin
, Washington, D.C.
Prepared by:
Istvan Csato, Colin Plank, Miles O. Hayes, Jacqui Michel, and Zach Nixon
Research Planning, Inc., Columbia, South Carolina
1. Introduction
1.1 Location and Geological Overview
The study area, called Poplar Point, is located on the southern bank of the Anacostia River in Washington, DC, a little over a mile east of the confluence with the Potomac river (Figure-1). This is the southern most region of the larger Anacostia River
Basin
and is influenced by a daily tidal fluctuation of about three feet (House Document 104-257, 1996). Important features to note in Figure 1 are the topographic highs to the north and south (elevations south of the study area reach 250 ft above sea level) that have historically served as local sources of sediment transported to the Anacostia and the tidal flats (shown by a stippled pattern) which are characteristic of the current estuarine setting.
The Anacostia river is formed by the confluence of the Northwest and Northeast Branches at Bladensburg, Maryland. The watershed area is divided into three major portions: the northeastern, northwestern and the tidal area, respectively (Figure-2). The tidal watershed is drained by the Hickey Run, Lower Beaverdam Creek and Watts Branch (ICPRB, 1988). Tidal influence in the Anacostia extends to approximately 1000 feet above the confluence of the Northwest and Northeast Branches.
As shown in Figure-3, the Washington DC area is located along the bo
unda
ry of two significant physiographic provinces: the Atlantic
Coastal Plain
and Piedmont Plateau. The bo
unda
ry line that separates these two provinces is called the "Fall Line". The significance of the study area's proximity to the fall line is that in areas such as this there is typically a thin sedimentary section (consisting of modern and ancient sediment of the
Coastal Plain
) that directly overlies and is affected by the structure of the crystalline basement
Rock
.
The Piedmont Plateau (Figure-3) consists of crystalline metamorphic
Rock
s with occasional intrusions of igneous
Rock
s. The
granite
,
gneiss
, schist and other crystalline
Rock
s range in age from Precambrian to late Paleozoic. The structural geology of the Piedmont is complex, including tilted
strata
, folds, and normal as well as reverse faults. The Piedmont units are overlain to the east by the sediments of the
Coastal Plain
The sedimentary strata of the
Coastal Plain
(Figure-3), consisting of a
succession
of Cretaceous to Quaternary age units, form a wedge that thins out onto the crystalline Piedmont to the west and becomes progressively thicker eastward. The depositional origins of the sediments that make up the
Coastal Plain
Stratigraphy
range from fluvial, to deltaic, estuarine, and marine.
According to the surficial geology map shown in Figure-3 the study area is located within Quaternary alluvium deposited by the Anacostia river and its tributaries. Underlying the alluvial cover of the Anacostia and outcropping in the hills just south of the study area is the Cretaceous
Bed
Rock
of the Potomac group. The maximum thickness of the Potomac Group in Maryland is about 5,000 feet (Trapp and Horn, 1977). According to Maryland's surface geology map, the Potomac Group has three members: Patapsco
Formation
, which contains silt,
clay
, minor sand and gravel; Arundel
clay
with lignite contents; Patuxent
formation
(sands and gravels).
Over time human use and engineering in the region have significantly altered the morphology and hydrology of the tidal Anacostia. In its natural state the lower Anacostia region (including the study area) was covered with wetlands associated with the Anacostia river estuary, delta and floodplain. Over 90% of tidal wetlands, including those in the Poplar Point area, have been lost. The Army Corps of Engineers estimates that, between Bladensburg and the river's mouth, approximately 2,500 acres of tidal emergent wetlands have been destroyed, leaving less than 100 acres of emergent wetlands (http://response.restoration.noaa.gov/cpr/watershed/anacostia/guide/aboutar/ wetlands.htm).
Multiple tributaries to the Anacostia existed as well but have been filled along with the wetlands to facilitate the growth of the metropolitan DC area. As human land use in the area grew the rivers became narrower and shallower due to increased sediment supply caused by the denudation of forests for the creation of farmlands and urban construction sites (Yorke, 1975). Compiling historic, geologic and engineering data, Williams (1977) reconstructed the stream network and morphology that might have existed before colonial times. In his reconstruction (Figure-4) the approximate extent of the landfill around the Poplar Point area is shown as well as the number of tributaries to the Anacostia that may have indeed disappeared. Of note is a creek just at the southern edge of the study area of this report.
The Poplar Point area as it looks today is shown in the aerial photograph is presented in Figure-5.
1.2 Data
The data that served as the core of our investigation was collected in 1997 by Thomas L. Brown and Associates. The data set consisted mainly of descriptive stratigraphic logs and the coordinates of 46 soil borings and 13 monitoring wells. The logs included brief characterization of the lithological units and their elevation above/below sea level. No age data were given in these borings. Water levels in the monitoring wells for 3 days were provided as well, as was the tidal stage at the time the elevation of the water table was measured. Lastly, engineering reports on subsurface investigations made for the Washington Metropolitan Area Transit Authority in addition to METRO report number 8 were received. 21 borings from the METRO reports were located in the study area (Poplar Point). Two additional borings north of the Anacostia river were used in the construction of our cross sections. The in
Formation
in these reports contained boring coordinates, main lithologic units, brief description of samples, and ages of the units.
It is important to note that the age data in the engineering reports were not based on absolute age measurements. Rather, these ages were based on the lithologic character of the
Rock
s and a general knowledge of the geologic
Formation
s. Therefore, some discrepancies in the given relative ages of lithologic units may occur. Despite this fact we have incorporated the revised age data available in these reports into our own study.
In addition to the stratigraphic data, basic in
Formation
such as aerial photography, watershed maps, river networks, roads, soil types, bathymetry, and surface elevation was provided in a digital format on the CD produced in 2001 by the Anacostia River Watershed Database and Mapping Project organized by NOAA's coastal Protection and Restoration Division.
2. Interpretation of the Stratigraphic Record
In the interpretation process, the lithologic descriptions were reviewed, correlations were made between borings, cross sections were constructed, and maps were made depicting the extent of the sand and gravel units on Poplar Point. Finally, a depositional history for the area was reconstructed. The locations of the borings and monitoring wells used in this study are shown together with the cross section locations in Figure-6.
2.1 Cross sections
The cross section A-A'(Figure-7) is the largest of the study, crossing the modern river channel and linking the study area to two borings on the north shore of the Anacostia river. The current position of the Anacostia river channel is shown on the section. The channel has a depth of 18 feet along this profile. The cross section shows that the river valley formed under the influence of extensional tectonic activity. The Cretaceous basement is bounded by normal faults on both the northern and southern sides and these faults are thought to have controlled the location of the original Anacostia river valley. Williams (1942) in the geological history of the region interprets uplift and tilting of the Atlantic
Coastal Plain
. The graben
formation
beneath the Anacostia river might have been associated with this tectonic activity in the Tertiary or lower Pleistocene. The age of the faulting and valley
formation
is post-Cretaceous, but the exact timing cannot be determined. The lack of Tertiary deposits in the area means that denudation may have occurred in association with valley
formation
at that time, or the Tertiary sediments might simply have been eroded in the Quaternary.
In the Pleistocene, as the initial form of the Anacostia valley took shape, coarse grained alluvial sediments were deposited on top of the eroded surface of the Cretaceous units near the valley edge. Borings HS-3, and SB-23 encountered this unit in the southern part of the study area and a similar sedimentary unit is found in boring F-226 on the northern edge of the valley. In our interpretation, this unit represents fan-delta type sediments deposited by creeks transporting mostly coarse grained sediments from the northern and southern hills. The
formation
(
Formation
code in this study: P-1-FD) is regarded as Pleistocene in age and was likely deposited prior to the last glaciation. This
formation
corresponds to T2-T3 unit in the engineering reports.
The fall in sea level associated with the last glaciation in the Pleistocene produced a deep incision into the tectonically preformed Anacostia valley and removed part of the earlier deposited sediments. Due to the incision, the river was transporting on high gradient slope and was carrying large amounts of sediments; the river type was most likely
braided river
. Gravels and sands were deposited in the study area as
braided river
channel bars. Borings F-227, F-231U and F-233 in Figure 9 encounter these deposits (
Formation
code in this study: P-2-BR). This
formation
corresponds with T5 in the engineering reports. It is significant to note that in our interpretation the
braided river
deposits are technically younger than the fan delta deposits. Previous work in the METRO reports interpreted T5 terrace units as being older than T2 and T3 deposits.
The Holocene sea level rise brought about significant fluvial
Aggradation
in the river valley represented by the thick
clay
, fine sand valley fill. The valley fill sediments eventually
Onlap
ped the Pleistocene fan-deltas on the flanks of the valley. This configuration can be observed in this section in borings SB-23, SB-35 and HS-3 where
clay
deposited over the Pleistocene gravels. On the northern side of the valley artificial fill obscures this relationship somewhat. The fine grained,
clay
-rich sediments are interpreted as undifferentiated flood plain and tidal marsh facies. These deposits correspond to intervals A1-A2 in the engineering reports. Interspersed throughout the
clay
rich Holocene section are 5 to 10 ft thick lenses of coarse to fine sands. These sands and localized gravels (labeled H-TB1, 2, and 3 on all cross sections) are interpreted as preserved tidal bars much like those seen in the estuary today (see tidal flats on Figure 1). This depositional origin explains the discontinuous and relatively thin nature of the sands. This interpretation is also supported by the observation and analysis of Williams (1942) who stated that feeble currents produced by tides formed sand bars in the Anacostia river.
Figure-8 shows cross section B-B' close to the southern part of section A-A'. It is essentially a close up view of the southern portion of the cross section A-A'. The graben in the basement is evidenced by borings SB-35, SB-23 and MW-10 that reached the Cretaceous series. A drop of 40-45 feet in the basement along normal faults can be estimated based on the drilling in
Formation
. The Pleistocene fan-deltas lie on the southern flank of the valley, and the Pleistocene
braided channel
sediments are drilled by boring MW-10. A Holocene sand-gravel unit is detected in borings SB-22, SB-30 and SB-31 (H-TB2).
The cross section C-C' (Figure-9) is oriented perpendicularly to the previous sections and runs along the southern limit of the study area (Figure-6). The correlation between the deeper borings in this section shows that the basal Cretaceous units dip to the west-northwest, further evidence of the graben forming tectonic activity descri
Bed
above. More importantly this section reveals that a smaller tributary valley was formed in addition to the main Anacostia valley, joining it from the south at an acute angle. The incision of this smaller valley is inferred by the absence of the P-1-FD unit (fan delta gravels) in borings SB-25, HS-32 and SB-24. The incision of this narrow tributary valley probably occurred during the last glaciation, coeval with the development of the larger ancestral Anacostia
braided river
. Further, the lowermost portion of boring HS-32, in the center of the interpreted tributary, contains a gravel rich layer which correlates well with the sediments interpreted as
braided river
deposits in borings F-227, F-231, F-232, and F-233 of the cross section A-A'. Another, smaller scale incision may have occurred at boring MW-4 where silt is deposited above the fan-delta unit.
The cross section D-D' (Figure-10) is another north-south oriented section and is located in the west-central part of the study area. The section, when compared to Figure 8 shows the overall thickening of the fan delta (unit P-1-FD) to the west as well as more of the isolated tidal bar sands within the Holocene alluvial
clay
s. Cross section E-E' (Figure-11) shows that in the center of the study area the stratigraphic section is dominated by
clay
s, except for the isolated
braided river
deposits at depth and thin lenses of tidal bar sands.
2.2 Mapped Extent of Permeable Units
Figure-12 shows the aerial extent of all sand and gravel deposits mapped in this study. It is important to note that while the tidal bar sands overlie the
braided river
deposits they are isolated from each other by more than 40 ft. of
clay
in most cases.
By far the most continuous unit mapped is the
braided river
deposit (P-2-BR). This unit is present from the southern edge of the study area north, extending beneath the river. While the data set used in this study is somewhat limited in its aerial extent, the
braided river
deposits are believed to be present at depth everywhere in the modern Anacositia Valley.
The fan delta deposits are mapped only on the southern edge of the study area, in association with the historic tributary drainage. These deposits are isolated from all others by the thicker
clay
s filling the valley. Deposits similar to the fan delta mapped on Poplar Point are believed to be present along both the north and south sides of the Anacostia river valley.
The tidal bar deposits are distributed throughout the study site, but are laterally isolated from one another by the tidal marsh/floodplain
clay
s. Lenses of sand such as these are most likely present throughout all of the Holocene sediments of the tidal Anacostia
Basin
.
2.3 Summary of Depositional Model
The depositional scenario discussed in section 2.1 and resulting in the geometry of the units shown on the map of section 2.2 is summarized in Figures 13-15. In the first stage, designated as Pleistocene 1 (Figure-13), the incipient Anacostia valley has already formed tectonically and the coarse grained fan deltas were deposited at the southern edge of the study area. These sediments were transported into the area by short, high energy creeks that originated in the hills south of the study area. Williams (1977)' reconstruction of the original drainage network supports this idea. In his map (Figure-4) a tributary is located at the site of these gravel sediments.
The next stage of evolution (Figure-14), Pleistocene 2, represents the period of valley incision caused by
Relative Sea Level Fall
associated with the last
glacial period
. During this time, the ancestral Anacostia valley was incised deeper into the incipient fault controlled valley and the
braided river
deposits were laid down on the valley floor. Due to a steep surface gradient at that time the Anacostia carried large loads of sediments giving the river a braided morphology, much different than the river appears today. Also at this time tributaries such as the one pictured in Figure 14 continued feeding from the north and south into the now deepened main valley. The steeper gradients resulted in incision into and removal of portions of the fan deltas they had deposited previously.
The final stage (Figure-15) was developed in the Holocene as sea level rose due to the end of glaciation. The rise of
Relative Sea Level
led to lower river gradients and the gradual
Aggradation
al infilling of the Anacostia valley as the estuarine setting visible today developed. The lower energy depositional environments associated with the infill of the valley (aggrading river floodplains and tidal marshes) resulted in deposition of a
clay
rich section with isolated sandy lenses present wherever point bars and/or tidal bars and flats were preserved.
3. Ground Water Flow
The groundwater data that were reviewed for the Poplar Point site were elevations measured in the monitoring wells (MW) 1-11 in 1997 and 1999, and a series of pump tests conducted in 1981 (METRO Report No. 8).
Figure-16 shows the elevations of the water table in each well as measured on at 12:30 pm on 22 February 1999. The wells have been classified according to the units in which they are screened. Note that the "deep" wells are screened at depths of 27-57 feet below the surface and in the Pleistocene gravel units (P-1 FD and P-2 BR). The water levels in these wells (MW 1, 2, 7, and 10) group together and are the lowest of all wells, ranging from 0.45-2.51 feet above MSL. The water levels in the wells (MW 2A, 5, and 8) screened only in the Holocene sand and gravel "tidal bar" unit (HTPB 1-3) also group together, more tightly so, ranging from 5.6-5.8 feet above MSL. The water levels in wells that are screened in the fill material are the highest of all the wells, ranging from 4.65-6.75. Two wells are screened only in the Holocene
clay
unit, and they have identical water table elevations at 3.9 feet above MSL. Water table elevations reported for other dates show a similar pattern for the different stratigraphic units.
These trends in water table elevation indicate that the upper permeable units, that is, the fill and Holocene sand/gravel, do not have direct hydrologic connections to the deeper Pleistocene gravel/sand units. They each have distinct water table elevations. The Holocene
clay
appears to act as an effective aquitard. The fill unit has the highest water table elevations, and thus groundwater from the fill could migrate downward to the lower units. The Holocene "tidal bars" unit may be hydrologically connected to the fill material because its water table elevations are bracketed by those in the fill.
Elevations were measured hourly for different groups of wells on 22, 23, and 27 February 1999, for up to 7 hours a day. The time-series plots indicate that there is some influence of the tides in the Anacostia River on the water table in both the shallow and deep wells. However, pump tests done in 1981 on the Pleistocene unit (called T-5 and A-2/T-5 in the METRO reports) showed that there was no hydrological connection between the aquifer and the river. Our interpretations of the
Stratigraphy
of the Holocene sand and gravel units also indicate that they are isolated from the river. The changes in water level in the wells reflect the effects of aquifer de
Formation
resulting from the 3+ feet tidal fluctuations in the river.
The horizontal groundwater flow patterns can only be generally descri
Bed
because there are only a few wells in each unit and the well distribution is poor. Figure-17 shows the water table elevation and surface elevation for the wells with known locations. Wells 1, 2, and 10 are in the same Pleistocene gravel and sand unit. For 9 out of 11 water table measurements, well MW-2 was higher than MW-1. For 6 out of 9 water table measurements, MW-10 had the highest water table. For this unit, there is no recognizable pattern in groundwater flow direction. The Holocene sand and gravel unit has three wells that are screened only in it (MW 2A, 5, and 8). Well-2A generally has the lowest water table elevation, by as much as 2 feet below the other wells in this unit. If these measurements are accurate, this pattern suggests horizontal flow in the Holocene unit is generally but weakly to the north.
4. Feasibility of 3D studies
In order to assess the feasibility of a 3D visualization of the
Stratigraphy
at Poplar Point, preliminary 3D plots of the interpretation presented above were developed. This was accomplished using the 3D Analyst and Spatial Analyst extensions of ESRIs Arcview GIS software. As shown in Figure-18, Figure-19, Figure-20 adequate data exist for an effective presentation of results in three dimensions. Such a study could be expanded to a three dimensional correlation of in
Formation
from all borings available, though a study extending to the northern
Shoreline
would be somewhat affected by the linearity of the dataset.
5. Summary
The analysis and correlation of over 50 stratigraphic logs from monitoring wells and soil borings on Poplar Point and the northern banks of the Anacostia revealed that the sand and gravel deposits present in the study area could be categorized in three groups. Each of these sandy units was isolated from the others by thick floodplain and tidal marsh
clay
s. The deepest and most continuous permeable unit consisted of
braided river
sands of the ancestral Anacostia river. Other stratigraphically higher and less continuous units were interpreted as fan delta deposits and tidal bars. This stratigraphic interpretation was in agreement for the most part with existing METRO interpretations, the only significant difference being the identification of isolated sand lenses within the Holocene
clay
s. Analysis of the groundwater data supported our stratigraphic interpretation in that wells screened in the deeper
braided river
deposits behaved similarly and had deeper ground water tables than those screened in shallow Holocene sands. The data available provides adequate coverage of the eastern half of Poplar Point. Data available within the river channel and along the northern shore is less extensive, occurring in dense linear trends associated with the subway installation. All data can easily be incorporated into a 3D site characterization.
References Cited
Cleaves, E. T., Edwards, J., and Glaser, J. D., (eds.), 1968, Geologic Map of Maryland, Maryland Geological Survey.
House Document, 1996, Anacostia river and tributaries, District of Columbia and Maryland, Communication from The Assistant Secretary of the Army (Civil Works), House Document 104-257, 591p.
ICPRB (Interstate Commission on the Potomac River
Basin
), 1988, Anacostia: The other river,
Rock
ville, Maryland, 16p.
Monday, April 22, 2013
Tulsa Web Design
Tulsa Graphic Design
Tulsa SEO
Tulsa Search Engine Optimization